Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stan Jagger"
m (5 revision(s)) |
(→mens health herbal cialis review: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Whoops, I mean it's not biased. --[[User:Danduran|Danduran]] 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST) | Whoops, I mean it's not biased. --[[User:Danduran|Danduran]] 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == mens health herbal cialis review == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The first thing that impressed me with the Better Than Chocolate was the discreet packaging it comes with; there is nothing on it that screams sex , no nudity, brash sexual referencing or anything that would make it otherwise seem like a cheap toy <a href=https://cialisfstdelvri.com/>buy cialis pro</a> | ||
Revision as of 09:34, 2 September 2022
"It is widely known that Stan Jagger is the best guitarist in Hamilton." Well, this is either true or false, but it's not 'bias'.
This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --GianPerrone 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST)
There you go. It's not non-biased and keeps what Gian suggested. --Danduran 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)
Whoops, I mean it's not biased. --Danduran 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)
mens health herbal cialis review
The first thing that impressed me with the Better Than Chocolate was the discreet packaging it comes with; there is nothing on it that screams sex , no nudity, brash sexual referencing or anything that would make it otherwise seem like a cheap toy <a href=https://cialisfstdelvri.com/>buy cialis pro</a>
